How to Connect if the Reason is Not Listed

booleanstrings Boolean 10 Comments

connect-li

(“Part One” briefly outlines some background. If you are only interested in “how-to”, please jump to the “Part Two” below.

Please note, that I think that inviting others for no good reason is NOT appropriate.)

Part One. Reasons to Connect

LinkedIn is a business networking site, where people can “connect” with each other. Connecting provides for ways to keep each other’s contact info; track interactions; perhaps get on the phone or meet in person; or follow-up after having met; follow each other’s business activity; refer business to each other, and more. In fact, LinkedIn is “the” Business Networking site.

LinkedIn provides us with a number of choices on why we’d like to connect with someone, including: colleague, classmate, we’ve done business together, and a friend. Up until a few days ago there was also a “fellow group member” option, that seems to be gone as of now.  This could be just a bug (or not).

LI-reasons

(Here’s a post about the missing feature: OMG! LinkedIn Invite No Longer Has “Groups” Option. If it is a bug we’ll hopefully see it back soon.)

Whether the absence of groups among choices is “a bug or a feature”, sometimes it’s hard to find the reason to connect and network among the offered “radio button” choices.  Sometimes there’s not a group in common either. How about these reasons:

  • “I [read your books/posts/ listened to your presentations] and would like to connect to hear more and stay up-to-date”
  • “I met you at a business gathering/conference, enjoyed our conversation, and would like to stay in touch”
  • “We have not done business together (yet) but from your profile information I see a really good reason to discuss the opportunities”
  • Such-and-such has advised I connect with you because…

 

NOTE: I think inviting people who (you suspect) may NOT want to connect with you is a bad idea. This is spamming.

Compare with the InMail choices for the Reasons

By the way, compare the above with the choices for InMails.  These still may not cover all the possibilities, but the selection is, obviously, wider. (Why?):
LI-reasons-Inmail

Thanks for reading through the brief intro. Comments are welcome.

Now, here are two workarounds. Here’s how to invite while avoiding the limiting choices for the “reason”.

Part Two. How to Connect if the Reason is not listed

Let’s say you have a good reason to connect with this person (listing a co-worker here as a real life example):

LI-connect

OPTION ONE: Search (for what you have already found!)

STEP ONE

Select the person’s name and a few keywords from the headline.

STEP TWO

Search on LinkedIn for the selected text. In the search results page you can now connect without stating a reason.

LI-connect

That’s it!

The advantage is that you can do this really fast. The drawback is that you cannot customize the connection message.

OPTION TWO. Save and Invite

 If you are able to Save the profile

LI-connect

(which is subject to some LinkedIn limitations), you can then invite the person from your Contacts page and customize the text as well.

STEP ONE

Save the profile.

STEP TWO

Go to the Contacts Sorted by New – see a way to invite – with customization text (and no selection list for the “Reason”)…

LI-connect5

… and send a customized invite:

LI-connect4

Thanks for reading 🙂 I hope many readers will benefit from the “how-to” part.

Comments 10

  1. Great post. If LinkedIn has removed the option permanently then it’s not a good idea really.

    But these tips are great. Also I have seen that you can send invites by saving to contacts even you are blocked from sending invites.

    Thanks

  2. Great workaround.

    However, if LI intentionally took away some of the ways to connect, they also read what we post and soon will disable some of these workarounds.

    For instance, you used to be to be able to click on a certain spot in a profile to find out the exact home zip code of the profile. This too got broadcasted and guess what?? You got it LI disabled it.

    Sometimes it really seems LI makes it harder for us to do our jobs.

    Am I the only one who feels this way???

  3. Great post Irina.
    I’m not a fan of option 1 as I believe in customization of the message. Option 2 is my recommended approach but it does have one drawback – you can’t do this for 3rd tier.
    There is of course a 3rd option now – mobile. Now that you can customize the message the mobile app becomes a ‘best of all worlds’ option. You can invite 3rd tier, customize and not have to give a reason!

  4. Excellent post and I totally agree with your approaches, although I would not favour Option 1 as Mark Williams stated. I once read an interesting Harvard Business School study which demonstrated people in a queue trying to push in line and being refused until they used the word ‘because’. Provide a legitimate reason to connect and more LinkedIn users will graciously accept.

  5. Great post, Irina.

    Let me suggest a couple of other potentially useful techniques (and forgive me if I state the obvious)::

    1. Read the person’s profile. Many people actually put their email address somewhere in their profile for those who are willing to read it – perhaps without the “@” sign. I’ve had my email in my How to Contact area (well below the headline) and I don’t think anybody has ever read down that far and used it since I joined LinkedIn.

    2. Use that email address to, well, actually, EMAIL that person. You can actually communicate more easily in email than in LinkedIn text-only messages anyway. Ask them if they’d like to connect on LinkedIn and you don’t have all the limitations that LinkedIn puts in front of you.

    3. Not all connections MUST be on LinkedIn. If they have their Twitter or other contact info on LinkedIn, use it. If they follow back, then they’ve noticed you. If they have a blog, comment on it. (*Ahem*) As you know, bloggers LOVE comments and commenters (most of the time). As we concentrate on LinkedIn, we sometimes forget there’s a lot of Internet outside of LinkedIn, too.

    4. And, of course, we’ve both already written about using Google search on LinkedIn.

    As far as the “bug” on LinkedIn that no longer allows us to connect to group members, how is it even possible, in a high tech company with supposedly some of the best people in their field, to accidentally leave off an important and well-used feature in their invitation architecture? Or is it really possible that they are so incompetent that there are no checks and balances to making changes to LinkedIn software? Is it curmudgeonly of me to suggest that this is a test to see what happens if they DO decide to permanently remove that feature?

    But nothing curmudgeonly in my thoughts about your post, Irina. Thanks.

    Andy

  6. Irianne –

    Thank you so very much for sharing such wonderful information; very well presented. I’d like to also acknowledge Andy for his great thoughts on connecting with other professionals on LinkedIn. Without a doubt, it can be an annoyance when receiving unsolicited invitations to connect from strangers, especially when you can clearly read through the intent purely to use/scam your connections.

    I’d like to share yet another method for reaching out to others with truly professional intent that has not been mentioned in previous comments. Although this may not work for every individual that you’d like to form a connection to, first, review the Public Profile of the individual of interest for the Groups they belong to. If you haven’t reached your maximum number of Groups, become a common member of a stated Group. That common membership will then allow for direct messaging capability; simply search the name of the individual of interest from the list of members!

    Hope this helps –

    Thomas Bertin

Leave a Reply to Cristina Treffner Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *